What Makes A Professional?
digg del.icio.us TOP
  Posted March 6th, 2014 by Zdenko  in Cycling | No comments yet.

Cycling Stories

Source: PEZ Cycling News

Comment: What Makes A Professional?
In a world where money is in short supply, it’s encouraging that there are so many pro cyclists in the UK. Or is it? Sponsor of Team Velo Ecosse, a long established UK amateur team thinks that there’s a lot of self delusion going on.”

The break with Alberto Losada and Damiano Cunego on La RedouteReal pros: Alberto Losada and Damiano Cunego on La Redoute

‘Professional,’ dictionary definition: ‘Relating to or belonging to a profession. Engaged in an activity as a paid occupation rather than as an amateur. Worthy of, or appropriate to a professional person; competent. A person having impressive competence in a particular activity.’

“What is a pro?” is an interesting question and one I’ve given a fair amount of consideration to. I’ve also debated it with others, who have an excellent knowledge of professional cycle sport.

pro-boonenTom Bonnen from Belgium

We’re not talking about Tom Boonen here, but while we’re at it – he definitely fits the definition of pro. It would seem that there are three clear requirements which have to be in place; we’ll consider them in a moment.

‘Back in the day’ it was far clearer who was a pro and who was an amateur – the races were totally separate and only occasionally was there any cross over. In the UK the term is being abused; with almost anybody being able to use the title ‘pro,’ whether worthy or qualified to, or not.

Over the near 30 years I have been involved in the sport, I have been lucky enough to work with a number of teams, professional and amateur; I think therefore that I’m qualified to comment in terms of ‘the package’. Excluding the WCPP the most any rider in the UK will earn is £25-30k, possibly a car, expenses and all equipment – that’s bikes, clothing, race food and sundries. Most however, are on much less, with many riding for only a jersey and a bike.

wxpl0q8508_600Professional team ‘Astana’ with Alberto Contador

Let’s try to establish the cut off – the line between the real pro and the full time ‘weekend warrior.’ The three factors required would be:

1) A salary that a rider can live on, and does not require a subsidy – like working in a bike shop part time or babysitting. I mention these because I have known riders who have classed themselves as pros but have had to do these jobs to fund their ‘professionalism’.

pro-fogIt ain’t all glamorous and pretty.

Realistically, £10,000 per year would be the minimum salary; that’s equivalent to around 1000 euros per month which is the recognised basic across the water; although in Europe the package may include digs and food – many teams will have a house to accommodate their riders.

2) A good team which will be UCI registered, with the infrastructure, logistics and management in place to provide the required back up. This will include a full time DS, mechanic and masseur as well as a minimum of five other riders on a similar or higher salary.

3) A programme of quality races throughout the season. This, for many of the people I spoke to, is the most important part of a pro’s package; if you haven’t got the races, you can’t get the results to start moving up the ladder. It’s pointless to pay the money for UCI registration only to ride domestic races, however.

And if you turn up at a UCI race without the quality of rider required, then you face not only potential elimination for finishing out with time cuts, but also a fine for fielding riders who are not up to the appropriate standard. This aspect of race programme is especially important for a young rider. They should know from the start of the season what their race schedule is – to enable them to prepare, peak and taper appropriately.

pro-upThe path to climbing the Berendries in the Tour of Flanders is a long and difficult one.

I’ve watched a number of riders head off to parts of the world which simply don’t suit their characteristics (skinny climbers to Belgium for example) only to return months or even weeks later, disillusioned and ready to quit. It takes a lot more to be a true pro then, than writing ‘professional cycling team’ on the side of a vehicle and then turning up at a local road race to compete against club men who are, “just off the back shift” – as Ivan so succinctly puts it.

He also pointed out the tendency, if one is constructively critical of any team or rider, for this to be construed as “negative” or “putting people down.” There is something of ‘the Emperor’s new clothes’ in this attitude; whilst many may think that a certain rider is deluding himself by defining himself as a professional, “it’s best not to say it!”

giro d'italia 2013 stage 10

There is no shame in not making it to the top, but it does appear that cycling alone has this obsession for riders to class themselves as ‘pro’ without any results to back the title up. An article appeared a few years ago in one of our national broadsheets declaring that three riders were ‘turning pro’ and that they were bound for ‘le Tour’ in the next few years. When I spoke to the journalist in question about the article, he admitted that it was unlikely the riders would make the Tour, but he had to ‘sex up’ the piece.

Unrealistic expectations and egos built on sand can be fatal when a rider is confronted with the harsh reality of continental bike racing. The podium girls may be lovely and the suntans cool; but riding Kermesses on a freezing cold spring day in Belgium or hanging onto some East European beast who ate raw meat for breakfast is no fun. Many former European pros revert back to the amateur ranks – and make a better and ‘easier’ living.

Finally, cycling sponsors who have been “over sold” can end up very disappointed about the lack of value for money they get for their investment. It’s much better to under promise and over deliver than do the opposite – that way it’s more likely for sponsors to stay on board and remain happy for several seasons rather than losing them through disillusionment with poorer than promised results.

The fan support wasn't enough to propel local boy Philippe Gilbert today

It’s accepted wisdom in the cycle trade that any advertising spend should generate three times the ‘spend’ in sales to break even; and five times the spend to make it truly profitable. In other words, if a rider is given a £5,000 bike, he needs to generate at least £15,000 of sales for the shop or manufacturer.

My trade radar tells me that next season will see even more ‘shop teams’ on the road – this is great for the sport and developing riders to national and ultimately international level. And it goes to show that the trade is putting something back into the sport – however this will only continue if the riders understand that they have to give their sponsors a good return on investment, not day dreams.

By Gregor Russell

Follow Zdenko’s Corner on Facebook !


Tags: , ,

Gotta Comment?
If you've got a comment or opinion you'd like to share, send me an email or fill the comment fields bellow, with only requirements your name and email address. I might just publish you in glorious pixilated black & white! Comments may be edited for grammar, spelling and length, or just to make them better.

Submit your own stories for the Zdenko’s Corner about rides, Gran Fondo’s, having a good time traveling and/or cycling, Croatian cycling history, etc. All stories are very welcome. There are more than 400 stories already in this blog. The search feature at the top right, works best for finding subjects in the blog. There is also translating button at the top of every story so you can translate each page to language of your choice.

Send your comments to: zdenko@zkahlina.ca

Leave a Reply